Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0391020060140010033
Journal of Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2006 Volume.14 No. 1 p.33 ~ p.41
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Two Different Salt Forms of Amlodipine, Amlodipine Orotate and Amlodipine Besylate
Tae Yu-Mi

Lee Kyung-Hoon
Abstract
This randomized, single-blind, two-sequence, two-period crossover study in 24 healthy volunteers with a 2-week washout interval compared pharmacokinetics of two salt forms of amlodipine formulations, the newly developed formulation (amlodipine orotate, $Orodipine^{(R)}$, Dong-A Pharmaceutical Company, Limited, Korea) to increase the dissolution rate at higher gastric pH conditions and the original formulation (amlodipine besylate, $Norvasc^{(R)}$, Pfizer Incorporated, Korea).

Methods: Plasma samples were obtained over 144 h after a single oral dose of 10 mg amlodipine, two tablets for each formulation. Plasma amlodipine concentrations were analyzed by combined liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization (ESI) using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). From the amlodipine plasma concentration versus time curves, the amlodipine pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental method.

Results: Mean of area under the plasma amlodipine concentration-time curve from time 0 to time infinity $(AUC_{0-{\infty}})$ of Orodipine was $336ng{\cdot}h/mL$ (coefficient of variation (CV)=31.3%) and that of $Norvasc^{(R)}$ was $329ng{\cdot}h/mL$ (CV=38.3%). Mean of maximum observed plasma amlodipine concentration $(C_{max})$ of Orodipine was 6.89 ng/mL (CV=25.8%) and that of $Norvasc^{(R)}$ was 6.46 ng/mL (CV=32.0%). The percent ratios of 90% confidence intervals of $Orodipine^{(R)}/Norvasc^{(R)}$ were $99{\sim}124%\;for\;(C_{max})\;and\;94{\sim}118%\;for\;AUC_{0-{\infty}}$ and the means of terminal elimination half-life $(t_1/2{\beta})$ of amlodipine were 44.0 h (CV=17.5%) for $Orodipine^{(R)}$ and 42.6 h (CV=16.7%) for $Norvasc^{(R)}$ respectively.

Conclusion: Since amlodipine orotate and amlodipine besylate showed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics, alteration of the salt form did not affect the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine.
KEYWORD
Amlodipine orotate, Amlodipine besylate, Pharmacokinetics, Salt form, Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectromeoy (LC-MS-MS)
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø